Postcolonial Literatures Unit 7 The Way Spain Was

Postcolonial Literatures Unit 7 The Way Spain Was, College and University Answer Bank for BA, B.com, B.sc, and Post Graduate Notes and Guide Available here, Postcolonial Literatures Unit 7 The Way Spain Was Solutions to each Unit are provided in the list of UG-CBCS Central University & State University Syllabus so that you can easily browse through different College and University Guide and Notes here. Postcolonial Literatures Unit 7 The Way Spain Was Question Answer can be of great value to excel in the examination.

Postcolonial Literatures Unit 7 The Way Spain Was

Join Telegram channel

Postcolonial Literatures Unit 7 The Way Spain Was Notes cover all the exercise questions in UGC Syllabus. Postcolonial Literatures Unit 7 The Way Spain Was provided here ensures a smooth and easy understanding of all the concepts. Understand the concepts behind every Unit and score well in the board exams.

The Way Spain Was

ENGLISH

POSTCOLONIAL LITERATURES

POETRY

VERY SHORT TYPE QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

1. In which year the poem was first published? 

Ans: The poem was first published in the year 1947.

2. From which collection the poem was taken? 

Ans: The poem is taken from the collection Third Residence (1947).

3. How many stanzas are there in the poem? 

Ans: There are three stanzas in the poem.

4. What does Neruda want to say by solar stone in his the way Spain was?

Ans: The poet speaker gives the message that Spain is unique from the rest of the world. It can be an instance for the rest of the world. It is like a solar stone that emits light.

5. What does the poem discusses?

Ans: The poem discusses the Spanish civil war which was fought between the left wing loyalists and right wing nationalists.

6. What has been expressed in the poem?

Ans: The poem expresses the pain and suffering afflicted on the natives in those days. In the beginning the poem draws a picture of Spain which has been dry since 200 years of monarchy.

7. What does the poem comments?

Ans: Pablo Neruda’s “The Way Spain Was” comments on the divided nature of Spain during, and after, the Spanish Civil War.

SHORT TYPE QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

1. What the way Spain was?

Ans: “The Way Spain Was” records the sufferings of people recorded in the history of Spain as a colony through many harsh images. The land blessed with nature’s bounty was destroyed in the civil war. He traces the history of Spain; the present invaders were once invaded by many.

2. What the Spain was by Pablo Neruda?

Ans: ‘What Spain Was Like’ by Pablo Neruda describes the duelling natures of Spain during the years of the Spanish Civil War. Its highs and lows have been slashed by storms but Neruda still finds a great deal to love. He recalls the beauty of the countryside and the “poor” people who lived there.

3. Write a short summary of the poem.

Ans: The poem begins with the speaker describing how Spain is under a great deal of pressure. The country has been pushed to its limits and then pounded like a drum. Its highs and lows have been lashed by storms but Neruda still finds a great deal to love. He recalls the beauty of the countryside and the “poor” people who lived there. He mourns over the losses the country suffered and how it changed.

In the second half of the poem he speaks in greater detail on the duality of the country. It is at the same time “rough” and “smooth.” The wine, a symbol for the resources the country has to offer, is “violent” and “delicate,” causing good and bad events to befall the land. The text ends with a hopeful message about the resounding goodness of Spain that will last longer than the strife.

4. What is the background of the poem?

Ans: Before 1930 there was monarchy in Spain. There was an economic crisis in Spain. The people of Spain eradicated the monarchy and brought the Republic Government. But there was no change in the economic crisis. Then Spain was again divided into two groups. On the one part there were the supporters of the Republic Government and on the other part there were the military and church under the leadership of Francisco Franco. 

The team of Francisco Franco was in favour of capitalism. On the contrary, the Republic Government was in favour of socialism. The team of Franco was supported by Nazis. Then ultimately, the civil war broke out in 1936 It lasted till 1939. Pablo Neruda was in Spain at that time. He was in support of the Republic Government and fought against the military party because he was a staunch communist. In the present poem The Way Spain Was Neruda described the condition of Spain after the civil war.

5. What is the tone of the poem?

Ans: It was published as a part of Spain in our hearts, the tone of the poem is dramatic as Pablo is not only pinning down the anguish he witnesses in Spain but also acting as a chronicler. He beautifully records Spanish history before and after the civil war.

LONG TYPE QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

1. Give a brief analysis of the poem. 

Ans: In the first stanza of this piece the speaker begins by using a metaphor to describe the state of Spain during the period of his residence there, especially during the Spanish Civil War. It is said to be a “taut, dry drum-head.” The affairs of the country are pushed to the limit, drawn tight across the land and beaten repeatedly. The “drum beat” of the nation reminds one of the Civil War in which Neruda fought. The war lasted from 1936 to 1939. Neruda’s role in the conflict ended after he was recalled from Madrid in 1937.

It is clear that Neruda sees Spain as having endured a great number of hardships. It was “lashed” or beaten just as a storm lashes the “Flatlands” or an “eagle’s nest” high on a hillside. Although these two are opposites they are both impacted by the events of the storm, just as all parts of Spain were touched by war and political and social strife.

In the next section Neruda’s love for the country comes through clearly He speaks of how he thinks on the “hard soil” and “poor bread” of the country. It does not, at least at this point in history, have the capability of producing good, solid food This is in part due to the nature of the ground itself. This is an extended metaphor speaking on how deep the problem go. They reach deep into the soil, or into the depths of the country.

He also weeps over the “poor people” of Spain and the “wrinkled villages” they came from. “Wrinkled” is a rather passive word that likely refers to the damage done to the countryside during the war and the proceeding and following shortages of material. These are all things he cannot stop thinking about.

In the final three lines he mentions the “metallic meadows.” This is a powerful alliteration that speaks on the contradiction of the world. He could be simply describing how everything’s been turned upside down, or thinking on the metal that is now in the fields.

The second stanza is list-like in its form. The lines come one after another as the speaker describes other attributes of the country. First, he speaks on the “confinement” of the Spanish people and their country. They are “isolat[ed]” from one another and from the rest of the world. This occurs not at a distance, but while they are “still conscious.” The fact that it is recognized is a positive. This means that change is possible.

He continues on to describe what “isolation” is like. It is not a physical isolation as much as it is a mental or emotional one. There is an “abstract” wall, made of “stones of silence” around the country. It encircles the “violent and delicate vineyards.” There are two sides to Spanish life, one made of “smooth wine” and another of “rough wine.” This acknowledgement is all a part of Neruda’s attempt to recognize the good and bad of the country. As well as do his best to remember the country he knew.

It is in the final stanza of the poem that Neruda gives the reader something to hope for. He steps back from addressing Spain the country and instead, reports on what he’s seen, perhaps just to the reader, or as a note for his own recollection. He states that that country is a “Solar stone.” A part of the earth that takes in and gives off light, heat and in some instances, danger and destruction. It is “pure” compared to other places on earth but still, it is “streaked / With blood and metal.” These elements run through the country like a vein through a stone.

He makes specific reference to “Proletarian Spain,” or the working segment of the population.. They are the people who are most clearly made of “petals and bullets.” The last line leaves the reader with some hope.

Neruda states that Spain is a country that is “Unique, alive, asleep. resounding.” Its beauty and general goodness radiate from the land. It is this that he wants to remember and set into history more than anything else.

2. Discuss the background of the poem ‘The way Spain was’

Ans: The Way Spain Was” is in the poetic collection Third Residence, which Neruda had written when he was a member of the Communist Party of the Chile. He is very much concerned about the common people of the land. Although his mind is burdened with seething social issues, he spoke as simply as possible to communicate his sentiments to the public. He recounts with passion the repeated suffering recorded in the history of Spain.

How unto crying out, unto the very soul

I live your barren soil and your rough bread, your stricken people!

How in the depths of me 

grows the lost flowers of your villages, timeless, impossible to budge, your tracts of minerals

bulging like oldsters under the moon, devoured by an imbecile god.

The poet brings out the harsh realities of life through various images. Fresh bloom of life that cannot be found, “the lost flower of your villages” continues to clamour in his mind. He is enraged that an idiot like god is punishing the land that he loves. Through the deep love for Chile he begins to consider Spain as his motherland. When he witnessed the ruins of Machuchu Pichchu, his love for the land became more intense. His mourning for the Spain’s glorious past is evident in the words “our stricken people”. Silence and isolation are repeated and cries of “Taut and dry Spain”, this phrase shows the core of his sensibility and the memories of war reminds him of the dull and loud sound of drums.

In spite of the fertility of Spain the poet is more concerned about the inhabited of the land affected by the civil war and dictatorship. He is very much conscious of the Spanish soil aged by years of sunlight and of regions invades by various races.

your harsh wine and your sweet wine. Your violent and delicate vineyards. Stone of the sun, pure among territories.

Neruda also mourns for his best friend Garcia Lorca and Miguel Hernandez, who died in the Spanish civil war. “Spain veined with blood and metals, blue and victorious”, this clearly shows the history of “king discoverers” and the tragedy of civil war which made him Republican and he uses his poetry as a weapon to fight against the violence.

The ordinary people of the society i.e, the common people are suppressed and their life’s plight is showcased clearly in the line “proletariat of petals and bullets/ alone alive, somnolent, resounding.” The people of rich fertile land are depended on their daily labours; their life is beautiful with the horror of war in it.

Opposition of ideas can be seen in the words “sweet” and “harsh”, in “violent” and “delicate” in “petals and bullets” these words confirms that Neruda is fighting against the suppression of “proletariat” He writes about a poor, but beautiful Spain, historically rich and glorious in the past, crushed and destroyed in the present. It is a fact that Pablo Neruda openly reacted to the contemporary political events in Spain and his own country that made him summaries his own life as follows:

I have had to fight and struggle, love and sign. I have had to see the breaking world, the triumph and the defeat. I tasted the bread and the blood. What more can a poet want? And all the alternatives, from the songs to the kisses, from the solitude to the people, exist in my poetry, participate in it, because I have lives for my poetry, and my poetry has sustained me.

Intense feeling for the colonised people is very much seen along with the reaction to the social and political events in his mother country.

“Discoverers of Chile” is taken from Canto General, Neruda’s the most important work. First, it was conceived as Canto General of Chile and later became the general song of America, i.e., Canto General. The new practice of addressing to an audience, communicating with a group of people becomes more specific in Canto General, a collection of poems that are often called epic poems of Chile. Published in 1950 and divided into fifteen sections, these poems tell the tale of Latin American people.

Songs of Canto General were composed over twelve years, which are also considered years of militant Neruda. Many sections of Canto General are dedicated to workers and peasants whose homes and experiences the poet had shared so many times. While reading these poems one feels that these are the people who are lending their voice to his poetry. Through these poems Neruda explains how his people were oppressed and exploited first by the conquerors and then by the dictators, the collection ends with an autobiographical account of him. Neruda celebrates the mysteries of South America, its flora and fauna, and gazes with wonder at an antique civilization that really belongs to pre-Columbian days.

“Discoverers of Chile” is taken from Canto General, Neruda’s the most essential work. To begin with, it was considered as Canto General of Chile and later turned into the general melody of America, i.e., Canto General. The new routine of tending to a crowd of people, speaking with a gathering of individuals turns out to be more particular in Canto General, an accumulation of lyrics that are regularly called epic sonnets of Chile. Distributed in 1950 and isolated into fifteen segments, these ballads tell the story of Latin American individuals. Tunes of Canto General were made more than twelve years, which are additionally considered years of aggressor Neruda. 

Many segments of Canto General are devoted to labourers and workers whose homes and encounters the writer had shared such a variety of times. While perusing these lyrics one feels that these are the general population who are loaning their voice to his verse. Through these lyrics Neruda clarifies how his kin were persecuted and abused first by the winners and afterward by the despots, the gathering closes with a personal record of him. Neruda praises the riddles of South America, its greenery, and looks with marvel at an antique civilisation that truly has a place with pre-Columbian day

In the first line the poet discovers the history of the invaders, who they are and from where they come? The Spanish force entered Chile under the commanding ship of Almagro (in some translation instead of Almagro, pronoun ‘he’ is used,’ he’ can be a suggestive of Pedro de Valdivia, who followed the route of Diego de Almagro in 1541 and established the colony at Santiago). ‘He’ may also indicate any or all of the conquerors of Chile.

The Conquers entered into the land with gunshots. The poet calls his country “my thin country”. The strong forces suppressed the small country Chile which suffered in silence. From the north Almagro brought his crushed ember: And over the territory, between explosion and sunset.

The poet uses various images to stress his point of suppression of the country like the “Spaniard meeting with his dry figure”; shadows of thorn and coal covering it with “mysterious kisses”. Again, he personifies Chile as an old man with a white beard, which is actually the foam from the sea.

It is a veiled suggestion that his people couldn’t hold out for a long period against the powerful invaders and so were compelled to surrender, to merge their own history and culture with that of their colonial masters.

Neruda admits that the Spaniard did succeed in conquering his undiscovered territory that lay beyond the seas and in ruling over the angry and yellow-coloured people of his land. They also succeeded in giving birth to a new civilisation that slowly and surely supplanted the old one of the native Indians like dropping the excrement (dung) by a sea-eagle that was hovering and circling above the sky.

Neruda starts with the history of the Spanish settlers in Chile, enamoured as they were by tales of richness and of wealth. Thus, we have a land where “coal covers it with mysterious kisses” and “Gold burns”, “Silver illuminates”. The imagery emanates with light and colour contrasted by shades of darkness that only emphasises the relationship between the colonisers and the Indian people the vanquished, and again Chile’s intrinsic relationship with Spain. It is continuous Eurocentric history that is only displaced by the myth of creation, probably Amerindian, where the eagle drops a strip of land in the sea and a country is born. Neruda describes his country in its actual physical form, in simple phrase such as “my thin country” and “silence lies in its long line”. This contains an indirect suggestion that the people could not hold out against the powerful invaders and so were compelled to merge their own history and culture with that of the masters. The sea appears as a descriptive factor and as a person whose “marine beard” all life follows. 

Neruda begins with the historical backdrop of the Spanish pilgrims in Chile, captivated as they were by stories of lavishness and of riches. In this manner, we have a land where “coal covers it with mysterious kisses” and “Gold burns”, “Silver illuminates”. The symbolism radiates with light and shading differentiated by shades of dimness that lone accentuates the connection between the colonisers and the Indian individuals the vanquished, and again Chile’s characteristic association with Spain. 

It is a persistent Eurocentric history that is just uprooted by the myth of creation, likely Amerindian, where the hawk drops a segment of land in the ocean and a nation is conceived. Neruda portrays his nation in its real physical frame, in basic expressions, for example, “”my thin country” and “silence lies in its long line”. This contains an aberrant recommendation that the general population couldn’t hold out against the effective intruders as they were constrained to consolidate their own history and culture with that of the experts. The ocean shows up as distinct components and as a man whose “marine beard” all life’s takes after.

Discovered in 1911 by the American explorer Hiram Bingham, Machu Picchu is an Inca stronghold in the Peruvian Andes near the modern city of Cuzco. Nothing is known of its history and it appears that it was never discovered by the Spanish Conquistadors. Bingham himself believed that the site was the last refuge of the Incas from the invading Spanish.

In The Heights of Macchu Picchu. The poet meanders through the world as ‘a empty net’ assembling nothing from the world. He dives his hand into the earth and finds the ‘sulphurous peace’ of the world and its ‘spent human springtime’. Neruda asks what is the ‘indestructible, the perpetual, life’ on the planet. The concentration shifts from the writer himself as he battles however the world and he sees that the whole world is in a comparable circumstance. The artist depicts the lives of individuals on the planet as they battle with living. Every day people die their ‘little’ deaths. 

many deaths comes to each  

Every day a little death.

He climbs to Machu Picchu as he climbs he gains an insight into the history of the place.

The stellar void of the final steps and the vertiginous spiralling road. He thinks about the general population who lived there once. Presently the place is unfilled; there is nobody in the land. He ponders who construct the city there whose remains are still there. He feels the vacancy, “Today the vacant air does not sob anymore’. Neruda addresses the lost Incas of Peru: “you tumbled as in pre-winter to a solitary passing. He says that they live on in the stones of Machu Picchu. Once the land is possessed by individuals yet now the land is vacant with its remnants. The land can be the casualty of misuse of colonizers. He feels for the grand past of the nation. He asks ‘where is the man?’ among the uncovered stones. Did Machu Picchu construct itself? Neruda needs to think about the general population who had once strolled the roads.

He dives his hand into the earth a moment time and finds Man. ‘At the point when… the excited condor beats my sanctuaries… I don’t see the quick animal.’ Instead, ‘I see the man of old’. Now Neruda loses all association with his European past; he is presently an American and his family relationship is with its indigenous individuals. Neruda addresses the local people groups, specifically the workers, weavers, bricklayers, and so forth. He requests that they ‘Ascend to be conceived with me, my sibling. Neruda feels his own otherworldly resurrection and a resurrection of the dead individuals of the Americas. The poem ends:

Cling to my body like magnets Hasten to my veins and to my mouth Speak through my words and my blood.

Neruda’s Elementary Odes’ are also a mastery of expression and imagery where he raises useful but mundane objects to sublime heights. His poetry cultivates simplicity of language and simplicity of technique; and his purpose is to strip his writings of any distorted or complex factors that may impede the understanding of the reader. His tone is optimistic and positive, and “Ode to the Tomato” is a wonderful example of a poem that presents a pictorial description of a salad making to which a reader can add the more profound meaning culled from an American culture.

In the poem Neruda uses the image of tomato as a symbol of coloniser.

This is very clearly seen in the lines,

The street drowns in tomato: noon 

summar, light breaks in two tomato halves

and the street run

with juice.

Here the poet uses the tomato to represent the invasion of Spanish and Portuguese colonial in South America. Tomato is the one of the major crops in Spain. So the poet indirectly symbolises the Spanish people with tomato. And that the tomato spread all over the streets of Chile like the juice. When cut, the “two/tomato/halves” looks like the two hemispheres to which Chile and Spain belong, the only difference being that it is summer in Chile in December (as it belongs to the Southern Hemisphere) and winter in Spain (as it belongs to the Northern. Hemisphere).

The coloniser doesn’t need any permission to enter or occupy land. That has been in the lines, the tomato cuts loose, invades kitchens the

South America is conquered, suppressed, exploited by colonialism. The coloniser of Chile (Spanish people) enters into the kitchen of Chile people’s house and occupies their places without any proper permission from them.

Each line of this poem is unusually short, containing no more than one to four words. The line structure causes the reader to look at the next and then the next line to complete the action that has begun, of preparation of the salad that is an essential part of the midday meal in both South American and European countries, especially Spain. Thus, Neruda starts with the season when the tomatoes fill the stalls of vegetable vendors and their colour, though not mentioned, instantly captures the attention. The “two tomato halves” are also reminiscent of the two hemispheres to which the countries Chile and Spain belong. It is not until the word “December” appears that we realise that the “summer” the poet is speaking about is of course one and the same in the Southern hemisphere. The fact that the tomato breaks its bounds and “invades/kitchens” remains us of another takeover of their lands and their culture by the Spanish colonisers

who came in the wake of Columbus. Neruda brings the picture of culinary delight to emphasize the union of two cultures. The Spanish people, who invaded Chile, sustained a relationship through marriage and by which there formed a mixture of culture of two races- the American (Red) Indians and the Europeans (Whites).

This union is poetically explained in the lines: 

beds cheerfully with the blonde onion, and to celebrate 

oil the filial essence of the olive tree lets itself fall 

over its gapping hemispheres, the pimento adds its fragrance, salt its magnetism…

The process of cooking aromatic salad mentioned in the poem indirectly speaks about the mixing of one culture with the other. The line “we have the day’s wedding” suggests the image of colonisation.

Of course, the salad bowl with its olive and pimentos also suggests a cheerful lending of Chilean and Spanish culture. In fact, the melting-pot culture of America has now been replaced by the concept of the salad bowl where all the colours can mix without losing their original shape, form, individuality and identity.

Neruda races ahead to the meal that beckons with its aromas. There is immediacy when he writes, “it’s time! Let’s go!” there is celebration and joy in this meal. “the festival/or ardent colour/and all-embracing freshness”. It is a veritable joining of cultures, at least through the common denominator of food.

Spanish colonisation over Chile can be characterised as pilgrim colonisation, wherein the colonisers blend with the colonised and the division between the two societies is obscured. The conquistadors took it on themselves to be a piece of the foundation and not disparage the status of the colonised. They shared culture, dialect and wound up noticeably one with the occupants of their settlement. This is one reason why Neruda’s verse does not contain any contempt towards Spain. 

This is especially apparent in the words like “a goodly majesty”, “we have the day’s/wedding”. There is no threatening vibe towards the colonisers of any sort. Neruda considers himself to be an epitome of the Spanish culture, as “the writer of damaged human nobility who brings alive a landmass’ fate and dreams’ ‘ According to Jaime Alazraki, “Neruda is not simply chronicling verifiable occasions but rather re-translating them with an unmistakable standpoint of history. Is glancing back at American prehistory and analysing the land’s rich, normal legacy”.

Postcolonial literature often focuses on the suppression, oppression, identity crisis, alienation, and cultural identity etc, faced by the natives of the colonised land. But the poems of Neruda present the theme of post colonialism in a different way, here though the atrocities of colonisers are portrayed he never hates them, instead celebrates the mingling of culture.

“The Way Spain Was” records the sufferings of people recorded in the history of Spain as a colony through many harsh images. The land blessed with nature’s bounty was destroyed in the civil war. He traces the history of Spain the present invaders were once invaded by many. Through many opposing images the horror of war and the plight of the affected people are portrayed effectively.

“Discoverers of Chile” brings out the pain of suppressed people under the rule of dictators. As a historian he discovers the past glory of the thin country and also its invaders. Silent sufferings of the native people and how they are compelled to merge culturally with the invaders are presented in this short poem in an emphatic manner.

In “The Heights of Macchu Picchu” though he describes the beauty of the landscape he is in search of the lost identity and the glorious past of the place. Now there is no man and he investigates where he has gone? The ruins found in the place give a hint to the colonial invasion.

In the poem “Ode to The Tomatoes” his love for the Spanish and Chilean collaboration is very much evident when he tells about the process of cooking salads. As he aromatically describes the mingling of different ingredients in the preparation of salad, his love for the mixed culture and the coloniser can be clearly seen.

3. Give an explanation of the poem. 

Ans: The poem is divided into three stanzas. In the first stanza Neruda described the condition of Spain during the civil war. here he also described his love for Spain. The second stanza puts light into the condition of man during the civil war. Finally, in the third stanza the poet speaker ends the poem with an optimistic tone.

“Tout and dry Spain was. 

a day’s drum of dull sound,

a plain, an eagle’s eyrie, a silence

below the lashing weather.” 

The poem opens with a picturesque description of Spain during the civil war (1936-1939),

Spain was tight or stressed due to the civil war. Spain is compared to a drum. The civil war has flattened Spain. The two parties of civil war are compared to drum beaters. The civil war affected the whole Spain from the plain to the mountain. There was a topsy-turvy condition during the civil war. Nothing was free from the civil war. The poet speaker used two things from two different parts of the atmosphere-the plain and eagle’s nest. As the plain was affected by the war, likewise the eagle’s nest i.e. the pace above land was also affected (eagle generally builds nests in high mountains). So, both the plainland and highland were severely affected by the civil war. The tumultuous condition has been heightened by the use of alliteration in the second line. There is a serene quietness everywhere due to the civil war.

“How unto crying, unto the very soul

I love your barren soil and your rough bread Your stricken people!”

The poet speaker here expressed his deep love for Spain. The natural landscape was barren.

Yet the poet speaker loved it very much. Here, there is an autobiographical touch in this line. Neruda, was in Spain and fought for socialism. Though Neruda was from Chile he loved Spain very much because he was there for a long time. There is an extended metaphor in the phrase ‘rough bread’. The present condition of Spain has become very severe due to the civil war. The problem goes into the very deep of the country. The people of Spain have been devastated by the civil war. So they are stricken. Here, there is a socialist touch in this line because as a supporter of communism Neruda pined for socialism.

“How in the depths of me

Grows the lost flower of your villages, 

timeless, impossible to budge,”

The poet speaker in these lines also reflected his love for Spain though he had left Spain long ago. The poet speaker wanted to convey that the freshness of Spain was no longer there after the civil war. Earlier the freshness was infinite. But the war has damaged it.

“your tracts of minerals

Bulging like oldsters under the moon,

Devoured by an imbecile god.”

Spain was rich for its minerals but the civil war affected everything in the earth of Spain. here, the poet speaker described the land of Spain at night after the civil war. He described the landscape at night because it is no longer beautiful due to the civil war. The poet speaker thinks that the people of Spain have been punished by a stupid god. Interestingly enough, ‘god’ here has been spelled with a small ‘g’. This is done because this ‘god’ may refer to the two parties of Spain who are at war-The Republic Party and the military party. The poet speaker thinks that Spain has been devoured by these two parties.

“All your extensions, your bestial solitude, Joined with your sovereign intelligence,”

The poet speaker in these lines depicted the condition of the people of Spain during the civil war. They are confined. Spain also has been confined. It is like animal confinement. Spain and its people have been isolated from the rest of the world. But the only ray of hope is that they are still conscious.

“haunted by the abstracted stones of silence,” 

There is a silence due to the civil war because the people of Spain have been silenced. They are unable to say a word because the warmongers have created a certain kind of trauma in the minds of the people of Spain.

“your harsh wine and your good wine, your violent and delicate vineyards.”

The references of ‘harsh wine’ and ‘good wine’ depict the two sides of Spain evil and good.

Wine in particular, is important because Spain is famous for producing and selling wine. So, wine is an identity of Spain to the rest of the world. In the next line the words ‘violent’ and ‘delicate’ have been juxtaposed. It is done only to present the characteristics of ‘vineyards’ as vineyards are related to wine. This is just a continuation of the earlier reference of ‘harsh wine’ and ‘good wine”.

“Stones of the sun, pure among territories,” 

Here. The poet speaker gives the message that Spain is unique from the rest of the world. It can be an instance for the rest of the world. It is like a solar stone that emits light. The word ‘stone’ is important. As a stone is unchangeable the real feature of Spain is unchangeable. The civil war cannot affect that. Here, the tone of the poet speaker is optimistic enough.

“Spain veined with blood and metals, blue and victorious” 

The reference of blood is very important. It is the real feature of Spain. According to the poet 

speaker the youths of Spain are vigorous. 

“proletariat of petals and bullets,

Alone, alive, somnolent, resounding.”

As a staunch supporter of communism and Marxism Neruda uses the term proletariat. By proletariat he refers to the people of Spain. He has the conviction that conscious proletariats can bring change in society. They can make a revolution. The people of Spain are vigorous, and courageous to make a change. Neruda is of the opinion that the turmoil situation of the civil war can be wiped away by the common people. Through these lines Neruda is trying to recapitulate the glorious history of Spain.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top